1. Content: Provide a comprehensive overview of the work, focusing on its major themes, methodology, and analysis. Position the book within the relevant field, compare it to similar studies, and evaluate its strengths, weaknesses, and overall value. Feel free to recommend the book to specific types of readers.

2. Language: Book reviews should be written in concise and clear English, aiming for around 1,000-2,500 words. Use technical language appropriately, avoiding unnecessary complexity and jargon. Keep in mind that readers may not be specialists in the book’s field, so make the review self-explanatory and accessible even without reading the book.

3. Formatting: The heading of the review should follow the format: Author. Title. Place of publication, Publisher, Date of publication, Number of pages, and ISBN. For example: Russian Practices of Governance in Eurasia: Frontier Power Dynamics, Sixteenth Century to Nineteenth Century. By Gulnar T. Kendirbai. London: Routledge, 2020. 246 pp. (ISBN:9780429515729).

4. References: Footnotes should be used sparingly, with a maximum limit of three if deemed necessary. Ensure that all references adhere to the Chicago format guidelines, available at: When referencing websites, including those mentioned in footnotes, use the Chicago format as well. Include page numbers when directly quoting from the book.

5. Review Policies: The journal reserves the right to decline unsolicited reviews that do not meet the language, style, formatting, and content requirements. Reviews should adequately cover the major themes of the book to be considered for publication. Accepted reviews will be published at the editor’s discretion in future journal issues.

6. Submission: Submit the completed book review in MS Word format to

7. Author Commitments: By agreeing to review a book, authors commit not to review it elsewhere. If contributors wish to republish their content on personal blogs or websites after publication, they must credit Acta Via Serica as the original publisher.